Latest
news from 'SANITY' click to
view
View Page2 or download in Word file format
Click on
image to download.
- This is the complete document to be laid before magistrates.
Visitors to the web-site are welcome to download it,
complete the blanks, and deliver to their nearest magistrates court.
Once you have laid the original document you will no doubt receive
allsorts of excuses
as to why the case will not be considered. So be ready to submit this
follow up document.
Click on image to download
or view Page2
and copy the text.
|
Get
the full picture
In London, Norris McWhirter, chairman of the
Freedom Association, and Torquil Dick-Erikson, who
first drafted the document, handed their copies in
at Horseferry Road, the court nearest the House of Commons.
Click
to view at Studio71 site |
This is the routine:
1. Look up your nearest magistrates court in the phone book.
2. Call them, and ask for the name of the chairman of the bench.
3. Complete all the blanks on the document.
4. Take it (or send it) to the court on Thursday 21 September, or
as
soon after as possible.
5. If possible get a receipt for its delivery.
You have no further legal obligations or duties. You have no
risks,
financial or otherwise. You may be interviewed for
clarification of the
contents, but you are not personally pursuing a private criminal
prosecution. You are simply doing your duty and laying
information.
Subsequent action is up to the magistrate. According to
Stones
Justices Manual: "When an information has been laid, a
justice, or the
justices clerk, must apply his mind to the information, and go
through
the judicial exercise of deciding whether or not a summons or a
warrant
ought to be issued by him."
We hope to have at least 100 identical documents delivered all
over the
country on the same day - Thursday 21 September 2000 - just before
the
Labour Party Conference. The media will be told at the same
time.
If you have time, and the resources, we invite you to make several
copies of the document and ask your friends and other supporters
to
complete and deliver them as well. The more the better.
Ideally, we
would like to have 500, 1000, perhaps thousands more delivered.
But
involving others is not essential.
Press Release follows:
Press Release from SANITY (Subjects Against the NIce TreatY)
Embargoed until 11.00am Thursday 21 September
Tony Blair Accused of Planning Treason
Several hundred notices of treason against Tony Blair and other
ministers have been laid before magistrates across the UK's this
morning
(Thursday 21 September, 2000).
A group calling itself SANITY (Subjects Against the Nice Treaty)
handed
in a notice at Horseferry Road Magistrates Court, London.
Throughout
the day, scores of others were being handed in at magistrates
courts
elsewhere. By the end of the week, at least 500 will
have been
submitted.
Sanity believe there is now abundant evidence to show that Tony
Blair is
about to relinquish the UKs veto on Justice and Home Affairs (what
the
EU calls "freedom, security and justice"). This is
demanded by a
substantial majority of European Union member states for inclusion
in
the Treaty of Nice, due to be signed in December.
Neither Tony Blair, nor any of his ministers, have ever denied
such an
intention. The foreign secretary, Robin Cook told Parliament
that HMG
would insist on keeping the veto on "taxation, defence, and
border
control". But he did not mention Justice. Yet a
resolution of the
European Parliament of 12 April 2000 demanded that the national
veto on
"freedom, security and justice" shall go. Since
then, the governments
silence on this point has been deafening.
If Justice and Home Affairs pass into EU control, the EUs
"Corpus
Juris" project will ultimately be adopted by majority voting.
Representatives of the European Parliament told the House of Lords
that
it was their full intention to introduce "Corpus Juris"
by majority
voting.
This will abolish the British right to trial by jury, and will
make all
British subjects and others in the UK subject to arrest and
incarceration by a Brussels-nominated European Public Prosecutor,
rubber-stamped by a so-called "Judge of Freedoms", with
no public
hearing nor obligation on the prosecution to exhibit any evidence
for so
long as they choose. Habeas Corpus, the long-standing
British safeguard
against the tyranny of the state, will have been destroyed.
If our government or parliament object and say we do not want it,
they
will be over-ruled. Corpus Juris will be forced upon us.
This is what
giving up the veto means.
Moreover the EU will acquire the power to decide, even against the
will
of parliament, to expand the strength and the scope of Europol,
equip
and train it with paramilitary weaponry, and send detachments of
it to
Britain, to be stationed anywhere on our land.
For the first time since 1066, armed men, completely out of the
control
of British authorities, will be at large on our soil, with
the connivance of
this government. All of
us, even
our Queen, will be completely at the
mercy of whatever the EU may
decide, and all its measures will become
irreversible.
To allow this will be treason.
The purpose of laying information of treason against the Rt Hon
Tony
Blair is to force the government into the open. His defence
against the
charge of treason is simple. If he makes a solemn and public
promise
that he will retain our veto in matters of Justice and Home
Affairs, the
charge will fall. He must say what he intends to do.
Magistrates have the power to summon Mr Blair and ask his
intentions.
They also have the power to issue a warrant for his arrest.
The EUs original publication on Corpus Juris (1997) included the
following proposals:
Single legal area Article 18
Indefinite detention
20, iii
Indefinite detention on suspicion of a future crime 20, iii
Police/prosecution one organisation 20/21/22
Extradition 21, i, b
Professional judges 26
Double jeopardy (loss of presumption of innocence) 27, ii
Accused told charges, but NOT evidence 29, iii
Secret trials 34
- except for judgment 34, iii
The present Labour government has already made three separate attempts
to introduce elements of Corpus Juris. Jack Straw has
attempted to
reduce the use of trial by jury (on the grounds of cost). He
has
proposed legislation to stop football hooligans going abroad on
the
grounds that they might commit an offence when they get
there. He has
also proposed to give the prosecution the power to appeal against
a
not-guilty verdict, which will abolish our freedom from double
jeopardy.
That same proposal will also have the effect of eroding the
obligation
on the prosecution to provide the burden of proof before the
accused
stands at risk, contrary to common law.
Top
|